Bid Opening Date - October 09, 2026 9:30 AM CT

Submitted Questions for Job 23810 - BGR-CVD-IM-1-094(238)172

Question 13

The plans specify exterior galvanized steel band connections at several existing-to-proposed RCP tie-ins and concrete collars at others. Due to concerns with achieving a reliable seal and fit using the exterior steel band on existing RCP, would NDDOT allow the Concrete Collar Detail shown in Section 20 to be used in lieu of the exterior steel band at all RCP tie-in locations?

DOT Response

Response Pending.

Submitted: 10/8/2026 6:28:31 PM

Answered:

Question 12

What is NDDOT's intention regarding the shoring being installed during Phase 2 as opposed to Phase 3? Would it be considered if shoring was installed in Phase 3 when all traffic when all traffic is off the Eastbound lanes?

DOT Response

Yes, the contractor can install the shoring during Phase 3, rather than in Phase 2 as currently stated in plan note 704-P02.

Submitted: 10/8/2026 3:06:07 PM

Answered: 10/8/2026 3:13:05 PM

Question 11

Are the bid items for TEMPORARY BYPASS and REMOVE TEMPORARY BYPASS for the bypasses associated with the gap paving only as there are only 2 each? Are there quantities for this work in the plan? Please clarify. Thanks

DOT Response

202-0102 REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BYPASS and 710-0100 TEMPORARY BYPASS apply to the temporary ramp connection detours used to pave the gap portion of the interstate paving. No informational quantities were provided in the plans.

Submitted: 10/5/2026 3:25:47 PM

Answered: 10/6/2026 7:59:18 AM

Question 10

I am looking for the CAD files for project #23810 in Burleigh County.

DOT Response

Those files are available on the MFT site. Instructions for how to access them is provided on the Plans and Proposals webpage with the associated job number. The files are saved in a folder labeled with the construction year that the project will be completed in.

Submitted: 10/5/2026 9:39:37 AM

Answered: 10/5/2026 2:18:14 PM

Question 9

Will the DOT allow the contractor to utilize/burn up the common excavation - waste (10541 CY) onsite within construction limits or will it need to be hauled off?

DOT Response

The project should be bid with the understanding that the material will need to be hauled off site.

Submitted: 10/2/2026 9:45:08 AM

Answered: 10/6/2026 8:43:18 AM

Question 8

Regarding the E-ticketing SP issued with Addendum 3: What capabilities will the NDDOT require through the E-ticketing app? The new SP says, “the Engineer will notify the Contractor that all or a portion of the load was rejected.” Does the notification need to occur within the app or can the notification occur verbally, by phone, text, or email? If the NDDOT uses the contractor's Haulhub/Jobslip account, inspectors would lose access to eDOT’s functionality, including load rejection and other DOT functions. They could still view e-tickets for the project and daily running totals, but Jobslip currently only supports exporting of individual tickets not daily totals. Each inspector could only be assigned to one project within one contractor’s Jobslip account at a time. The contractor would need to add and assign inspectors when they arrive, then remove them before another contractor could add them to its account. This process would repeat each time an inspector moves between contractors. The engineer/inspector couldn't be on more than one contractor's Jobslip account or have access to more than one project. Do the tickets need to be stored in the cloud/app or can “one time” tickets be issued? For instance, are emailed tickets acceptable if the information is in a digital format? Does the app need to tabulate the quantities or simply make the quantities available?

DOT Response

Q: For rejected loads, does the notification need to occur within the app or can the notification occur verbally, by phone, text, or email?

A: The notification is not required to be within the application.

 

Q: Inspector access

A: Coordination and communication would be required to ensure that inspectors are able to access tickets for multiple operations on the project.

 

Q: Do the tickets need to be stored in the cloud/app or can “one time” tickets be issued? For instance, are emailed tickets acceptable if the information is in a digital format?

A: E-tickets should be stored on the apps’ cloud/server in accordance with the Special Provision.  E-tickets must be submitted to the Department using an E-Ticketing application.

 

Q: Does the app need to tabulate the quantities or simply make the quantities available?

A: An electronic daily haul summary is required for materials paid for by weight.

Submitted: 10/2/2026 8:48:58 AM

Answered: 10/6/2026 2:50:10 PM

Question 7

In Section 6 Sheet 6 Note 704-PO5 masking using removable tape is called out, but in the last part it says "if used". Will greying out with paint be acceptable or is using removable tape be the only acceptable method?

DOT Response

Due to recent MUTCD revisions, using paint to gray out the existing pavement markings is no longer acceptable.

Submitted: 9/30/2026 4:14:33 PM

Answered: 10/1/2026 8:22:40 AM

Question 6

302-P01 calls for the base course to be tightly bound, show no rutting, and no displacement under the roller after trimming. If the baskets are not placed 2000’ ahead of the paving operation and two trimmers are used, does this note apply to both trimmers?

DOT Response

We want the base course to meet the 302 specifications after trimming operations, but we will not require a roller between the second trimmer and the paving operation. Plan note 302-P01 will be revised through the addendum.

Submitted: 9/29/2026 12:26:01 PM

Answered: 9/29/2026 3:43:07 PM

Question 5

What type, size, and spacing of reinforcement is in the existing 7" continuously reinforced concrete?

DOT Response

We don’t know definitively what type of reinforcement is in the existing pavement. In the original plans, three different reinforcement alternatives were provided to the contractor. Those detail sheets have been attached to this response and will also be uploaded as supplemental information for the project.

The Bismarck District was contacted to ask what type of reinforcement was found in the existing pavement of the recently reconstructed I-94 projects from RP 162 to RP 172. Rebar was found in the pavement, although the exact size was not determined.

Submitted: 9/22/2026 9:58:48 AM

Answered: 9/29/2026 9:49:45 AM

Question 4

SP 593(25) states the “Salvaged base course shown in the plans needs to follow the requirements outlined in Section 302..." [i.e. Uniformly mix aggregate placed in windrows before spreading. Compact aggregate, utilizing pneumatic-tired rollers, until the surface is tightly bound, shows no rutting, and no displacement occurs under the roller operation.] And “In addition to the requirements outlined in Section 302…provide salvaged base course that meets the requirements outlined in Table 302-01…" And “Salvaged base course must meet both the elastic modulus and moisture content requirements at the time of base course placement. In addition, the salvaged base course must meet the elastic modulus requirement after salvaged base course has been trimmed for the first time and within 72 hours of concrete placement.” Note 302-01 states “Once the trimming operation is completed, ensure the base course is tightly bound, shows no rutting, and no displacement under roller operation”. What will be done to ensure ALL the SBC meets the requirements of Section 302 and the specified elastic modulus and moisture content AT THE TIME OF PLACEMENT (prior to trimming) and not just the SBC at the location of the LWD test?

DOT Response

The contractor is responsible for meeting both the 302 spec and the requirements laid out in SP 593(25). The department will test according to the SP and observe the base during roller operation. 

Submitted: 9/22/2026 9:45:21 AM

Answered: 9/25/2026 9:42:19 AM

Question 3

Note 550-P01 waives the requirement to place steel, tie bars, and dowel bar assemblies 2,000 feet ahead of the paving operation and allows the use of the roadway as a haul road provided temporary construction access crossovers and interchanges are utilized to limit the amount of hauling over the finished base course. What is the maximum spacing required for the crossovers? Is there a minimum spacing that will be allowed?

DOT Response

There is no defined maximum or minimum spacing. Because the intent is to reduce hauling over the finished base course, crossovers may be placed as necessary to meet that objective while ensuring the safety of the traveling public.

Submitted: 9/22/2026 9:34:48 AM

Answered: 9/24/2026 4:19:49 PM

Question 2

Note 302-P02 allows the shoulder to be used as a haul road and prohibits aggregate trucks, dump trucks, etc. from driving on the roadway base course within the proposed concrete pavement width except when dumping. Note 550-P02 allows the shoulder to be used as a haul road and prohibits driving on the base course within the proposed concrete pavement width except when dumping. Note 550-P01 waives the requirement to place steel, tie bars, and dowel bar assemblies 2,000 feet ahead of the paving operation and allows the use of the roadway as a haul road. If the roadway is used as a haul road, will trucks be required to stay on the shoulder except when dumping?

DOT Response

Yes, the trucks will be required to stay on the shoulder except when dumping. 

Submitted: 9/22/2026 9:33:15 AM

Answered: 9/25/2026 9:30:26 AM

Question 1

Will the NDDOT provide or pay for the secondary control for stringless paving?

DOT Response

An addendum will be issued.

Submitted: 9/22/2026 9:29:56 AM

Answered: 9/24/2026 3:27:48 PM